Print this pageSend to friend

Throughout history we as a people work together in gaining a social and respectful opportunity of equal worth, an understanding towards each other. Our liberty and laws we uphold is our structured base of our social order in the ways of day to day country and land, diplomacy and panels of senate adjudicators for more intellectual judgment and fair outcome.

This in past-time was constructed and implemented throughout the Roman Empire years before the ‘Son of God’ in the pursuit for fairness and opportunity, thence passed on throughout the civilized world.

Roman Empire; laws were stated clearing, enforced by roman soldiers, employed as security and defence force for imperial and senatorial civilised provinces and cultures, in the purpose of peace and social order. These laws clearly outlined where and when freedom of expression can be used with tolerance given.

The Imperial Government; and the Romans in general, tended to be very tolerant towards most religions/cults. In-place were sanctioned areas away from the main public sectors for religious philosophy and/or storytelling, unsanctioned areas near palaces and temples, places of business for security reasons were restricted in-line with roman views, customs and to protect against political rebellion and/or protest that may cause trouble and/or conflict.

Yet the ‘God of the Greeks’ felt that with the power at hand of dictating his word over others was enough justification of being above the law of the land, in-creating rebellious gatherings in unsanctioned areas, disrespecting the traditions, authorities and customs of those societies within, thence was arrested for the direction of others in heinous crimes of innocents and attempts to undermine roman authorities/law after repeated attempts to redirect him to a more sanctioned areas.

The centurion; centurions took up senior staff roles for Rome; commanded 40 to 240 men said after the ‘God of the Greeks’ conviction via a diplomatic senate jury having exercised all areas of a civilized court system before judgment “Certainly this man was innocent!” in-dealt that because of this man’s morals, being of a positive nature he was incapable of leading a rebellion of lawlessness.

The ‘God of the Greeks’; knowing that such actions he had taken there is no way-out of being sentence to crucifixion. Note: crucifixion is one of Rome’s common practises for criminals and crimes against humanity, in-sending a message ‘lawlessness will not be tolerated’ that living on roman land requires loyalty to the empire, in coming to the conclusion of this the ‘God of the Greeks’ keeps positive; it’s not unusual for dictators to put a positive image (angle) of view on a negative outcome/situation, saving face freely expressing to his people that he’s doing this for their salvation of sinning.

Hmmm how does someone that’s committed offences himself via his direction able to die for the sins of others establishing himself to a status of a God above others rather than of equal worth? A man of flesh and bone that ages, spending his youth observing prophets, studying scriptures with minimal schooling or writing, finetuning his storey-telling to a point of dictating in his own style of repetitive programming, turning his own reality in to a living story in-becoming his state of mind.

Greeks/Jews could not be charged with the crimes committed during his Passion such as killing babies and young children, theft, assault and so much more, scaling to preference rather than responsibility, naturally nature respectfully upholding laws of life brought to justice later in the timeline.
That time being death, something we are all destined for from the start of life.

Living life from the beginning to end is our learning curb, the continuous trials of our existence and growth in-which is passed on throughout the circle of life. When we die some say there is a tunnel of light that leads us to the other side, this maybe so.

But through common sense and logical thinking it would be more determined this to be other, in the ways of our power-station via the fact that when you’re dying our brain is suffocating; in suffocation shutting down our brain, going through a stage of degeneration.

This degeneration is subconscious memories of family, moments in life or other in regression. Once the degeneration has passed our brain now has come to the end of its energy levels (electrical pulses) and powers down, in-turn doing so produces a form of white light just like an Old TV before extinguishing forever. Note: a brain cannot be restarted from this point after so many hours of passing, if able may result in brain damage.

Having a shared destiny is something we all have in common, through the survival of our race to the planet hanging in the balance; a destiny for unison, respect, understanding, connections and design; the design of a better place to live; an opportunity for contentment; the chance of free speech or better living, as well as a chance to survive.

Being able to be free gives us the chance to practise our choices of interest in what we believe in, to our rights in living in accordance to what we believe.
In saying this, does this give us a right to misdirect others via the falsification and/or fabrication of claims made; denoting other beliefs/thoughts that don’t coincide with ours; making use of our choices to practice unlawful acts or as an excuse to harm the innocents of others in making a point throughout the pursuit of having our words in what we believe in heard and feared.

Claims/falsification; acts of fraud towards the public stating the following claims or errors in correctness of philosophy, you choose.

1) Tablets Claim; these are written by Gods hand or did Moses through an act of desperation? Note: intense heat in-design manual construction, history in smelting and fusion (slaves), cavemen techniques that are registered.

2) Nile Rivers Parting; claim God parted the waters of the Nile or was a pulley system over river used for transportation of carts and people across without the disruption of shipping, using weights on riverbed. Note: with an undercurrent anything within river bed would be forced down river overtime referring to roman cart wheel found but not allowed to be recovered (laws of water).

3) World flooding; Noahs Ark was built and ended up on a mountain after flooding or is it positioned as it was built on, a mountain with forest surroundings. Note: we would not have the population growth of current date if the world had flooded nor cultural diversity.

4) ‘God Existing; ‘The Book’ claims that God exists in at least two dimensions of time. Religion also suggests that science has indicated that God must exist in more than three dimensions of space and one dimension of time, but never defines God as infinite, but defines him as existing beyond the limitations of our four dimensional universe. Note: Time exists in all dimensions of space that having a heaven in another dimension without time would be impossible due to population growth and turnover would be unsustainable. Science has to date never given claim to his existence, being no evidence of the fact, rather if he did exist faith has had no substantial proof to date, just an idea built on sand rather than stone, being practise since the beginning of time in numerous ways, for numerous reasons, in numerous forms.

Some of us over time have chosen to look to faith or to believe in something or someone in ways of completing our independents by becoming dependant slaves instead via grasping-out to what’s not there, so we are not alone for comfort or to make something insignificant standout so it has a significants in the pursuit of explaining our existence for personal security; to find a place in the social world, a sense of belonging as a group rather than an independent individual for acceptance, or a way to make us feel that in-being part of this choice gives us more power over others rather than an even-level in influence and/or a chance of persecution against those not of their choice of belief in the denial of variations in life (stating a person without faith is worse).

Fear; the fear of punishment and the hope for forgiveness; the fear of not being forgiven for the punishment we’ve given, the fear of losing control the point in the creation of fear, that not being in control of something means we are powerless; to regain control of our fear, our way of thinking has to be controlled or fear will control us itself.

Throughout life as a constant reminder that not being religious, enslaved to God by accepting faith, is translated to the fact that you have chosen something other and/or a Judas against their suggestive vision and limited ideals; that you fear the acceptance of an idea to be true, that we are all guilty without being; ‘without guilt those still will be judged’.

These common references from people being mentally controlled and their fear of others can be due to the fact of confusion, the confusion of what’s real and what’s not; what text terminology is philosophy and what’s is not; that one is free of choice; that tolerance goes both ways without using demeaning tactics or ostracizing because of difference in interests; that making a personal independent choice is human; that people are not Satan worshipers or Judas’s for not believing in the fiction of a suggestive idea nor living according to the ‘God of the Greeks’ laws in ‘the Book’ just to satisfy peoples social and personal ideals.

Religious Separation Tactics; Sociological methods of grouping for zebras - people that require direction and social guidance; Book-repeat in regular rehash of understanding religious text and terminology knowledge for mental tuning referred to in religion as harmony. Note: harmony means agreement, accord, concord, discord, synchronization.

Stating that someone is a Judas can be taken more than one way due to the fact, that Judas Iscariot was a dedicated man to religion and a true testament to loyalty of roman laws. He was not swayed to harm others in the pursuit of freedom (terrorist acts), yet also loyal to his friend ‘God of the Greeks’ a man with ideas and ideals for a vision. Judas Iscariot betrayed him due to such acts stated then killed himself out of grief. Note: commonly this word ‘Judas’ is used in reference to betraying the ideals of religions.

Religion/Satanism Comparison; for personal information I am using an IPod as Religion and an Mp3 Player as Satanism, these are products produced by the same manufacture as the example.

To sell an idea you need to play one idea off another for up-selling, first telling them about the plain old Mp3 player, describing it and playing it down being the lesser item of choice using body language, stating that they are only interested in talking to you about the IPod, than to close the deal they promote the IPod as the only choice. ‘The greatest’ it can play clips, music and store movies and not buying it means not being accepted by your friends for not keeping up to date with the latest; having more uses then the plain Mp3 player, so the customer are aware of both choices, but one looks a little grim than the other and hard to resist.

People like in the comparison that sell and/or own an IPod may also suffer from arrogance and/or capable of one-sided preference; nonsolid evidence buyers and theory translation; reprisal against those not of same idealistic ways; aggression towards non owners or buyers; negative imaging/responding towards people who don’t have one or with independent thought; denial of any other views other; vindictive in variations; back-stabbing towards non owners; implicated in meanings; crimes against humanity fanatics; narrow vision all owners; dishonesty of vision; prosecution against non owners; preference given to owners in democracy via church influence used to spread the word of IPods as well as threats of torture and harm directed towards non owners (religious verbal and text).

Everything is done with a goal, that goal can be a long or short-term goal within our realistic reach. With goals we are aiming for something and/or an achievement, but also the goal is generally for the ‘good’, without good there would not be bad, as in bad coincides with good, to be good is to be bad.

Taking the O out of good equal’s God, to be good is to be God! In reference to good being God this could be a misconstrued point of origin, for where the displacement of the O for good went from God, in-turn redirecting our attention from good as the sum of all created, to the reference of God by church’s; in being good for God as an equality we just will not know! Maybe in conclusion life is not about seeking a god but rather just being good.

For all too many, these marvellous scriptures have no meaning beyond the literal meaning of the literal words, this is so for God remains a giant enigma.

Conclusion; Through the indulgent acknowledgment of this series of subjects #1, #2, #3 we can better understand the minds and movements made by modern man through our own history, our design and implementation in the creation of maturity mind-set, diversity in vision with unison for achieving an outcome of logical and sound approach in our goals of harmony.

Regards
Brett J Hutton

Strykers Lounge Aus