Print this pageSend to friend

Police are lower than AFP Agents but higher than Citizens they refer to as underlings and will determine their service according to a second class citizen; helping accordingly to their own independent preference without looking at facts or evidence of technology a majority of the time.

On completion of training to become a police officer, it’s required that you must work in a state other than their own. Police making these personal determinations of their own independent thought have basic education schooling in gaining entry commonly around 18 years of age.

Making personal determinations without looking correctly at the evidence, not looking-up police records of the people in question, not printing out information for cross-checking but determining with personal preference if something illegal is illegal and if it should be pursued.

On the 21.09.2009 at 16:30pm – 17:00hrs I was at the Cairns Police Station asking questions and I was informed that statements given over counter do not proceed any further. There was a rookie serving on the front counter at this time, this rookie did not have a ranking as of yet, serving without ranked officers supervising his approach of determination of outcome and recourse for coaching and direction purposes.

In reference to the subject the rookie was handling was in relation to a known criminal that last was charged with an act of terrorism sentenced to 350 hours of community service for having maps of government buildings, flight plans; this person a pilot most of his adult life threatening police to go through with it. The subject in relation was that this person was making text and verbal threats of harming others; extortion and blackmail in an attempt to deface good character as well as breaches of the child protect and care act by wanting to use a file of an independent that grown up in care.

This officer ask if there was evidence twice through this conversation when text, email as well as a voice message contained on a CD was sitting on the counter in front of him the entire time. He said they could not help because it’s not illegal and that because he’s in another city he would not be arrested. The officer then was asked for the contact details of his boss; in his words quoted “No, you have my name” indicating to his name tag “if you keep this up you will be arrested for disturbing the peace”.

What can I say but this officer has obviously allot to learn about his approach in handling cases, personal determination of peoples character, and may need to rehash the law with indications lack of law knowledge on what’s legal and what’s not. The policy in the police force is that an unranked officer must be attached to a ranked officer at all times when handling clients.

Treatment of innocent citizens like criminals and criminals given preference seems to be a common trend in Queensland. There are two other cases I am aware of, one being of assault by a pub manager at Annerley Brisbane with a camera only feet away and incorrect statements given, no one was arrested; the other an incident with a person being railroaded by a forklift at the Brisbane Markets that was setup, no-one was arrested either even though the officer from Rocklea Brisbane could clearly see the 3 other people involved were clearly irate about being questioned and demonstrating guilt at the scene via trying to fabricate.

Ethics in service is given to preference via the direction of lord mayors orders of looking after local communities & cities, rather the personal cases where as service may differ accordingly. This means that in the community the service is at a high standard and respect is given accordingly in relation to the public’s help, but in asking for help independently outside the communities sight you may not get the respect nor service that your expectations require.

Sociology of human behaviour in the service I consider to be standardised twentieth century tactics, these tactics are determined by a series of questions that have the option of looping, as well as reversing for the response of making to you bite, become irate or to increase your blood pressure to a point that the information you state may incriminate you.

Under the law you never have to state anything to an officer no matter how convincing they may come across, even if questioning you within their premises you can just sit there and say nothing.

I would recommend for innocent or guilty clients stating nothing at all, not even your name verbally in an interview except “I require contact with my lawyer if I am to be arrested” that way if you are arrested and not given contact with your lawyer, your lawyer can use this to your benefit.

Just pass your ID as that indicates who you are, is all you are required by law, not answering any questions asked of you even if they make empty threats such as arresting you or making out your sentence will be harder, as this does not incriminated you nor make you worse off.

If you are sitting in an interview room while waiting to see if they are going to arrest you the only comments to make is if they touch you indicate time and name of person that puts their hands on you, as well as if they slam their hands on the desk using standover tactics comment “stop hurting me” and then continue to say no more.

After stating nothing through the whole interview so it’s a waste of time and they decide to arrest you out of spite indicate you require contact with you lawyer again, as under than law they cannot refuse lawyer contact no matter the charge or they can be sued accordingly.

The most common way to get information out of someone is by getting you to answer numerous questions and draw a picture of the situation or incident for a plausible outcome to make a conclusion to be used in a court of law.

Brett J Hutton
http://www.bretthutton.bravehost.com